/bi-/ has been advertised having locative-terminative force in lieu of purely locative push for /ba-/, but Thomsen states for the p. 184, it “may perhaps be maybe not automatically useful for how come off concord that have a great loc.-name. or loc. noun, but it rather suits the brand new semantic differentiation of your verb. “

>ba(I): possess a separative function. In the OBGT they directly correlates which have >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, pursuing the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >with the Akkadian primary.) Their position are once brand new ventive >marker yards and therefore the b was soaked up: m-ba- > m-ma, assuming this can be >accompanied by a second people pronoun, it gets yards-ma > m-mu (very ba >isn’t necessarily straightforward to identify). On lack of this new >ventive marker they occupies the initial position on the chain, and then it >dont often be well known away from ba(II). A very clear instance try >ba-ne-su8-be2-en-de3-durante = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = i disappear >on it (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): features good stative/inactive means. In OBGT VI, it’s rendered by the >a-c-stem stative/inactive, otherwise an down dating Nt-stalk couch potato. Seem to, ba(II) >occupies the initial condition from the strings. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-durante >= cuckun, cuckunaku = he has got become placed / I’ve been place >(by the somebody unnamed). The fresh new versions ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-durante into the OBGT VI, outlines 160-165, was unclear; they’re able to >rather become translated once the ba(I), particularly the second collection, >which is a couple of-new member, as well as the OB grammarian, just who made them >by Nt-stem passives, nicely maintained new ambiguity. > >Your report obviously relates to ba(II), but Really don’t found it just a great >case of taste, just after you have set ba(I) aside. Definitely, it is >ways outside of my personal tips and my ability to check on my personal above >syntactical/lexical claims from the unilingual messages. > >With my best regards, >Peter J. Huber

I thought of all the intransitive sentences one end having ba-Means, such ba-gul, “it was lost”. Because you say, people fall-in the course off ba(II).

I might provides envision it had been a >Hebrew word, but then again, I am not sure the connection of your Sumerian >code and also the Hebrew words

Many thanks for finding the time to try to describe that it topic. I could attempt to synopsis just what Hayes has on profiles 162 and you may 256: He believes one scholars enjoys speculated there can be a couple ba- conjugation prefixes that will be homonyms. “A person is seen mainly in the couch potato sentences, others when you look at the faster definable contexts.” Including, brand new conjugation prefix bi2- sometimes takes place which have nominal phrases throughout the locative-terminative situation in addition to conjugation prefix ba- possibly happen having nominal sentences regarding locative situation. “It is this trend of co-thickness which has contributed several scholars to conclude you to definitely bi2- and you can ba- are not of the same review due to the fact other conjugation prefixes, and so are probably consisting of more than one feature.” Therefore one to kind of ba- may include an element you to definitely represents the new locative circumstances. To own an excellent separative definition, you would expect locate Sumerian affordable sentences end into ablative postposition -ta.

Mention the brand new delicate differences >built in OBGT VI, contours 79-84, amongst the typical G-base stative >while the C-stalk stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-dentro de = cakin, >caknaku = he’s place, I am placed, vs

>I became wanting to know for people who you will definitely address a concern for me. We have see someplace >your title “Eden” was a beneficial Sumerian word. > >At the very least, if the Paradise, Adam, and/otherwise Eve was Sumerian conditions, could you >delight let me know if they have an interpretation/meaning?

EDIN is actually good Sumerian word, it is the steppe residential property between them rivers, where herd pet grazed.